Urolitha bipunctifera GEOMETRIDAE
Urolitha bipunctifera GEOMETRINAE GEOMETRIDAE
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuYyZJydRS3tFlR83VnTr5hsxBnMQPF2Qevn5BvuO0t7_wztr3IEpdx5FLHhGVsYr0mLFQgOeLd_4PrNtqZLGpxY80DXPvIBG2NqnSDf_Zj0zDt97QAzyX0H_it2mfDTG_wvtGrUNI1oI/s200/Urolitha+bipunctifera+GEOMETRINAE+GEOMETRIDAE-2.jpg)
Sub Family:- GEOMETRINAE
Genus:- Urolitha
Species:- bipunctifera
There are still a lot more that I have yet to identify, or have been unable to identify.
***********************************************************************************
Heliocosma argyroleuca HELIOCOSMA Group
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9ZaDMcr-q16KZFGvYbvzcIL63naUOzlPTcGjQbPWwLyUqJfpmh9I9Siq3REa4x6zJeAe2CRgs4WbJEJkLidhLE3bSa1qT6wlCaE6HebrnTrLUiJY4_S8fyZjkkrfDlxEojtCFLGjGapY/s200/Heliocosma+argyroleuca+HELIOCOSMIDAE-3.jpg)
Sub Family:-
Genus:- Heliocosma
Species:- argyroleuca (probably)
Identification
The internet sites I checked when trying to identify this moth shows there is a lot of confusion, particularly if going by wing pattern, colouring and other visual identifiers. Two of the normally reliable sites I use for identification have photos of what look like the same moth named as both Heliocosma argyroleuca and Heliocosma incongruana. This doesn't necessarily mean they are wrong, but there is a need to be careful.The site boldsystems.org has a number of photos of each species separated into what appears to be the correct species groups, and so, for the time being, I will go with the best match from that site, which is Heliocosma argyroleuca. This also matches up with a couple of other sources, one of which I know the gentleman who photographed the moth is an entomologist.
This does bring up the subject of using the internet for identification. A number of sites are simply copying (or being given copies) of the information that appears on other sites. Contributors may also incorrectly identify a moth from another incorrect identification. The original identification may be incorrect and this is copied to the next site and so on.
The original photographer/ identifier may go back and correct the original source but the correction does not always flow on.
I try to get consensus from a number of sites and books and still end up with errors. I have seen photos that I have corrected after publication on this blog, turn up in other places uncorrected.
********************************************************************************
No comments:
Post a Comment